Loading…
Loading…
Connecticut CART Act first obligations begin · Oct 1, 2026 · See what changes
A compliance site is only useful if its dates and figures are right. This page says what we check, what we have not checked yet, and what we got wrong.
Verified means dates, status and headline figures were re-checked. Some checks relied on law-firm or agency summaries rather than the full statute text, so read the source before you rely on detailed requirements. Any entry without a verified date has not been re-checked. This is general information, not legal advice.
Was: Written before the bills were signed. Described a 90-day notice and 25-worker threshold for SB 951, a right of first bid and penalty fund, and guessed SB 947 would take effect January 1, 2027.
Now: Both bills were signed September 30, 2026. SB 951 uses the existing 60-day Cal/WARN notice and adds technology displacement disclosures, operative January 1, 2027. SB 947 is operative July 1, 2027 with a $500 civil penalty per violation.
Was: Stated as fact that Colorado published a revised ADMT draft on September 23, described a UK AI Regulation and Safety Bill at House of Lords committee stage, and gave a BC lawsuit theory that OpenAI helped plan the shooting. Also captioned a server-room photo as the UN session.
Now: Colorado filed its proposed rules on August 11 and said interim revisions were expected by September 23, which we could not confirm were posted. The hearing and final comment deadline are October 26. The UK has no AI bill. The BC complaint alleges OpenAI flagged the shooter in June 2025 and did not alert police. Image and alt text replaced.
Regulations tracker, third pass
Was: The EO 14179 entry said Virginia had an active AI law and predicted federal duties would not grow, the White House framework entry said it protected smaller developers and covered workforce displacement, the NYC hiring-law entry said the law was actively enforced and required 3-year record retention, the China entry claimed log retention and blanket identity verification, the ISO 42001 entry said it aligns closely with the EU AI Act, the FDA entry said clearance is always required, and the NIST entry said several states offer safe harbors.
Now: Virginia's bill was vetoed and the December 2025 order targeting state AI laws is noted. The framework is described from its March 2026 text. NYC enforcement is described using the December 2025 State Comptroller audit, and the 3-year retention claim is removed. China's log-retention and blanket identity claims are removed. ISO 42001 is not a harmonised AI Act standard. FDA review depends on device pathway. Texas TRAIGA is the state safe harbor tied to the NIST AI RMF.
Regulations tracker, second pass
Was: The NY RAISE Act was dated June 2025 and called the first state frontier AI law, Canada's AIDA was listed as pending, AB 2013 was described as covering datasets of 1 million or more records, CFPB Circular 2022-03 and the EEOC AI guidance were listed as in effect, the FTC penalty was $51,744, the SEC entry cited Corporation Finance AI guidance that we could not find, the EU-US entry actually described the EU AI Pact, and Colorado still listed the 2024 impact-assessment duties.
Now: RAISE was signed December 19, 2025 (California's SB 53 came first). AIDA died with Bill C-27 in January 2025. AB 2013 has no dataset-size threshold. The CFPB circular was withdrawn May 12, 2025 and the EEOC removed its AI guidance January 27, 2025. The FTC amount is $53,088. The SEC entry now describes its enforcement cases. The EU-US entry is now the EU AI Pact. Colorado lists the SB 26-189 duties. Australia's standard was replaced by Guidance for AI Adoption on October 21, 2025.
Was: Texas TRAIGA and Virginia HB 2094 were listed as pending, Colorado showed SB 24-205 as the operative law, and EU AI Act high-risk duties were dated August 2026.
Now: TRAIGA has been in effect since January 1, 2026. Virginia HB 2094 was vetoed on March 24, 2025. Colorado's SB 24-205 was replaced by SB 26-189 (effective January 1, 2027). EU high-risk duties now apply from December 2, 2027 under Regulation (EU) 2026/1744.
Notion AI vs Microsoft Copilot
Was: Said Copilot runs only on Azure OpenAI, that Notion commits to no training only on paid tiers, that Notion offers no BAA, and priced Copilot at $30.
Now: Anthropic and OpenAI are Microsoft subprocessors. Notion does not train on customer data by default on any plan, Enterprise can sign a BAA, and Copilot Business is $21 per user.
Microsoft 365 Copilot vs Google Workspace
Was: Gave wrong Google Workspace prices, said Google offered only usage counts for AI activity, and said Copilot audit logging needs E3 or higher.
Now: Prices, Google's Gemini log events and Vault, and Copilot's Audit (Standard) 180-day default retention are corrected against vendor documentation.
California 2026 AI bills tracker
Was: The descriptions of SB 813 and AB 1405 were swapped, and the article treated signature as still pending.
Now: Descriptions match the Governor's official announcement.
AI acceptable use policy template
Was: Said Claude Teams was required for zero retention, which conflated no-training with no-retention.
Now: Separates the two and dates the check. Consumer plans of ChatGPT, Claude and Copilot may train on data unless you opt out.
Found something wrong? Email [email protected] with the page and the source. Confirmed errors are fixed and added to the log above.