Loading…
Loading…
Connecticut CART Act first obligations begin · Oct 1, 2026 · See what changes
AI Regulation Reference
31 laws tracked across the EU, US federal government, US states, UK, and international bodies — filtered and explained for small teams.
Connecticut CART Act first obligations begin
Connecticut CART Act
The AEDT statutory framework takes effect, employers can no longer use an AEDT as a defense to a discrimination claim, and an AI-related layoff requires its own notice alongside existing mass-layoff notices.
View law details →Super Intelligence definition proposal due (60 days)
Super Intelligence EO (2026)
The assistant to the president for science and technology must submit proposed legislative language defining Super Intelligence, including whether it should modify or supersede the current statutory definition of AI. The 60 days run from the September 29, 2026 order, so the date is approximate.
View law details →EU AI Act Article 50 transparency grace period ends
EU AI Act
Transparency obligations for generative AI providers and deployers apply from August 2, 2026. The AI Omnibus gives systems placed on the market or put into service before that date until December 2, 2026 to comply. The Commission published the final Code of Practice on marking and labelling AI-generated content on June 10, 2026.
View law details →EU Product Liability Directive (revised) effective
EU PLD (Revised)
The updated EU product liability framework extends liability to AI and software. AI developers selling to EU customers face product liability for AI-caused harm without the previous compensation cap.
View law details →Colorado SB 26-189 takes effect
Colorado AI Act
Colorado's replacement AI law takes effect, focused on disclosure, transparency, and targeted consumer protections for automated decision-making in consequential decisions.
View law details →California Adam's Law operator obligations begin
CA Adam's Law
Most operator obligations under SB 1119 begin, including a pre-release risk assessment of harms to children for new or substantially modified companion chatbots.
View law details →EU AI Act — GPAI model obligations fully enforceable
EU AI Act
Full GPAI model obligations under the EU AI Act become enforceable, including systemic risk assessments for the most powerful models, adversarial testing, and cybersecurity measures. Affects providers of large foundation models.
View law details →Connecticut CART Act employee and applicant notices
Connecticut CART Act
Notice obligations to employees and applicants about AEDT use, and the developer information-sharing duty, take effect.
View law details →EU AI Act Annex III high-risk obligations apply
EU AI Act
Stand-alone high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III, including recruitment and credit scoring, must comply under the postponed timeline set by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744.
View law details →EU AI Act Annex I product-embedded high-risk obligations apply
EU AI Act
High-risk AI embedded in regulated products under Annex I, such as medical devices and machinery, must comply under the postponed timeline.
View law details →EU AI Act original high-risk date, postponed by the Digital Omnibus
EU AI Act
Colorado replaces its AI Act with SB 26-189
Colorado AI Act
Texas TRAIGA (HB 149) effective
Texas TRAIGA
California SB 53 frontier AI transparency requirements effective
CA SB 53
California AI Transparency Act (AB 2013) effective
CA AB 2013
Virginia HB 2094 vetoed
Virginia HB 2094
EU AI Act prohibited systems ban takes effect
EU AI Act
NYC AEDT Law enforcement begins
NYC AEDT Law
Illinois AI Video Interview Act effective
Illinois AI Video Interview Act
Status guide
Unfamiliar terms?
Conformity assessment, GPAI model, high-risk AI — all defined in plain English.
Browse the glossary →